August 20, 2010

"Hindenburg Omen" is Nonsense

You may have seen some news lately about a "Hindenburg Omen" which is a complicated pattern of stock signals that experts say signals a market crash.    By "complicated pattern of stock signals" I really mean a bunch of random coincidences that are basically meaningless when put together and by "experts" I mean scare mongering idiots who somehow got people to listen to them.  

Think I'm being too harsh?  Just read this bit about the so called omen from a WSJ article on the topic:
"The Omen was behind every market crash since 1987, but also has occurred many other times without an ensuing significant downturn. Market analysts said only about 25% of Omen appearances have led to stock-market declines that can be considered crashes."

OK lets parse that.  The Omen has happened "every market crash since 1987".   But also happened "many other times" without a crash.   Ok so right there its obviously not very dependable.   Then analysts say it precedes a crash "only about 25%" of the time.  So the Omen happens before "every" market crash except the "many" times that it doesn't and it is wrong 75% of the time.  

Wow.  Thats about the dumbest "omen" I've heard of.   If 75% of the time the market DOESN'T crash then isn't this Omen a more accurate prediction that there WON'T be a market crash???    75% > 25% last I checked.    I sure hope 25% correct is not taken by anyone as a 'good' rate.    25% correct gets you an F in middle school and it should get you an F in stock market analyst circles too.

Here's an example.   This article The Past Performance of the Hindenburg Omen Stock Market Crash Signals 1985 - 2005  was written on Oct. 2, 2005.  He says: "During the past two weeks, we have had six Hindenburg Omen signals".    Lets look at the stock market in the period from Sept 2005 to Oct 2006:

Source: Yahoo Finance

S&P 500 is in blue, Dow Jones in Red and NASDAQ in green.    Do you look at that chart and declare to yourself that it would have been a good idea to sell everything in October 2005?   I don't.   You can see that from September to October of 2005 the market did drop a few % points.   But by December it had recovered that loss and was up a few points.    Then 12 months after the Hindenburg Omen events occurred the market was up 5-10% points.     

That same article also says: "Our research noted that plunges can occur as soon as the next day, or as far into the future as four months."   I don't really find it too useful for someone to say that the stock market might go down sometime in the next 4 months.  In fact I think its a fairly good bet that will happen.   The stock market is down 5% in about 1/8 months.    Over the past 80 years if you took any random month and said that in the next four months the market would drop 5% then you'd be right about 33% of the time just randomly.

You can call a string of coincidences an Omen but it doesn't mean anything.  It isn't necessarily anything more than a string of coincidences stringing out into the past.   If I slap my knee and then flip a coin and it comes up heads that doesn't mean anything.  If I do it 3 times in a row it still doesn't mean anything.  I could call it the "knee slap omen" if I want but its still meaningless coincidence.  If I slap my knee and then flip a coin a 4th time then the chances it will come up heads are 50/50.

 Bottom Line:  The Hindenburg Omen has preceded a crash only 25% of the time.   Seriously folks this so called Hindenburg Omen is total nonsense.    

1 comment:

  1. Might as well consult your astrologer or tarot card reader to time the market.


I'm starting to get too many spam messages in the comments so I'm turning on moderation. Please be patient and wait for your comment to be approved. Note it may take up to a few days for approval, thanks. I've also had to remove anonymous posting of comments to cut down on spam and pure stupidity.

Blog Widget by LinkWithin