May 8, 2008

More on historical home appreciation.

The other day I posted about How fast do homes appreciate historically? At that time I had only found census data back to 1963 and some spotty data for previous decades. I calculated annual home appreciation at 5.9% for 1963-2008 and figured that dating back to the 1920's that homes have historically appreciated around 5% annually.

Since then I've found another source of data going back to the 1890's. The site Irrational Exuberance from Robert J Shiller has a Excel file with the data set for home values that he discusses in the 2nd edition of his book, Irrational Exuberance. That data shows pretty low appreciation in home prices in the 1890 to 1920 period which drags the overall historical averages down.

Examining the data on the Irrational Exuberance site, I find home appreciation for specific historical periods was as follows :

1890 to 2007 3.44%
1900 to 2007 4.22%
1920 to 2007 4.03%
1948 to 2007 4.87%

Or roughly splitting up before WWII and after:
1890 to 1939 0.75%
1940 to 2007 5.45%

Or the past 100 years, 1907 to 2007 : 3.78%

If you break it down into decade chunks we get:

1890's 0.53%
1900's 1.40%
1910's 3.30%
1920's -0.70%
1930's -0.45%
1940's 8.16%
1950's 2.67%
1960's 2.57%
1970's 8.12%
1980's 5.86%
1990's 2.84%
2000+ 9.27%

Note that these numbers are all the nominal figures and do not account for inflation adjustment.

So what does all this new data tell me? First it seems the long term historical home price appreciation is 3-4% range rather than 5%. Personally I think that the data from 1890 to 1910 is much less relevant to today. At that period in time we were still transitioning away from an agrarian society and the world was a much different place. I think the past 100 years is a much more realistic measure of history if we're going to use it as a basis for what may happen in the future.

Given this new historical data, I'm going to use a rough figure of 4% for historical home price appreciation. Since appreciation in recent history post WWII has been a higher 5.45% I think that a 4% figure is a decent conservative value.


  1. I live in San Francisco and my wife and I in our early 30s and just bought our first condo. Many people of our parent’s generation have experienced an average 8% home price appreciation over the past 40 years! Meanwhile many of them still pay property tax like it is 1985. This has lead them to believe that bay area real estate is infallible, and they encourage their own kids to bite the bullet on million dollar 1200 sqft homes (often with hundreds of thousands of dollars of help).

    I’m pretty concerned because I only expect 0-3% appreciation on our Condo over the 5 years, and if we could afford a house in 4 to 5 years (we don’t have the big $ help), I don’t know what I kind of home price appreciation we could expect through our middle years and into retirement. I’d like to hope that we could expect 4-6%, but I feel like we are still in a local bubble created by tech money, prop 13, and the irrationality of older generations.

  2. Housing since WWII has been driven by the demand of the baby boom generation which is now aging into retirement. Housing prices will reflect the generally declining demand of the boomers although some regions may benefit.

  3. This article was written in 2008, but due to the housing market crash through 2011 and still falling, I would love to hear what the corrected 2000+ appreciation is? I hope this is not a closed thread. It's very interesting.

  4. I have not revisited the topic to account for the real estate bust. I may do so in a future topic.

  5. Thanks for the great article. I am going to be the speaker at my referral group on Friday, and I am going to talk about real estate appreciation.


I'm starting to get too many spam messages in the comments so I'm turning on moderation. Please be patient and wait for your comment to be approved. Note it may take up to a few days for approval, thanks.

Blog Widget by LinkWithin