April 14, 2013

CPI-W versus Chained CPI-U from 1999 to 2012

In recent news there is a proposal to use 'chained CPI' for the COLA adjustments for Social Security.   I'm not going to comment on the politics of that idea since I prefer to avoid political debates here.   However I do think its useful to see the progressive difference between Chained CPI-U or C-CPI-U versus CPI-W over time.    I'll also throw in CPI-U for comparison, hey why not.  C-CPI-U is relatively new and they only have numbers back to 1999.

I pulled the data from the BLS CPI site.   I used the multi-page table to get the figures.   I'm only looking at the December index value to simplify it.   I also normalized them all to start at basis of 100.0 in 1999.   Here is the annual December Index for each index from Dec. 1999 to Dec. 2012:

(click for full size)

The total increase for the 13 year periods are :

total CAGR
CPI-U 36.9% 2.45%
CPI-W 37.5% 2.48%
C-CPI-U 31.9% 2.15%

CAGR is the compound annual growth rate.   Annually the difference isn't huge but it adds up to a few % difference over a decade.

Put this into perspective, say someones monthly social security check starts at $1000.   If it goes up 2.48% with CPI-W then the next year the check will be $1,024.80.    If we use C-CPI-U instead then it will go up 2.15% and they'd get $1,021.50.    Thats a monthly difference of $3.30 for a single year.    Now over time that marginal difference would add up.   Starting with $1000 in 1999 you'd end up with $1,375 from CPI-W and only $1,319 from C-CPI-U or a $52 difference per month cumulative over 13 years.


No comments:

Post a Comment

I'm starting to get too many spam messages in the comments so I'm turning on moderation. Please be patient and wait for your comment to be approved. Note it may take up to a few days for approval, thanks. I've also had to remove anonymous posting of comments to cut down on spam and pure stupidity.

Blog Widget by LinkWithin